Judge Blocks DOJ Effort to Pause Maryland County’s Gun Law
Federal judge denies DOJ request to suspend Montgomery County’s ‘sensitive places’ gun law, citing lack of standing.
3 min read
A federal judge has denied the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request to put a county gun-control ordinance on hold, ruling that the DOJ lacks standing to pursue the case. The DOJ filed a lawsuit against Montgomery County, Maryland, over a law that prohibits carrying firearms within 100 yards of multiple locations, including churches, on August 3, arguing it violates the Second Amendment rights of parishioners. United States District Judge Theodore D. Chuang, an Obama appointee, issued his opinion on Monday, stating that the DOJ’s complaint lacked any allegations of actual conduct by law enforcement officers related to the law.
“[T]he complaint is devoid of any allegations of any actual conduct by law enforcement officers relating in any way to Bill 23-26E,” Chuang wrote. “Indeed, there is no claim or record of actual enforcement actions taken by Montgomery County law enforcement officers not only in relation to Bill 23-26E since its enactment in July 2026, but also in relation to Bill 21-22E, the prior amendment to Chapter 57 enacted in 2022, or earlier Montgomery County laws relating to possession or transportation of firearms in or near places of public assembly.”
Even the DOJ isn’t immune from leftist judges’ favorite anti-2A trick: throwing out your case on stupid standing arguments, thereby never having to touch the Bruen analysis at all. https://t.co/RyPmWPjftf https://t.co/jiES4AOgRv
Senior United States District Judge Deborah K. Chasanow, a Clinton appointee, previously issued a ruling in September blocking enforcement of the “sensitive places ban” in a case brought by the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) against the D.C.-area county on behalf of a synagogue. Chasanow referenced the Supreme Court’s decision in Wolford v. Lopez, which invalidated a similar Hawaii law containing multiple provisions restricting the carrying of firearms. The DOJ had previously warned Montgomery County that its legislation could leave worshipers defenseless against an attack before filing its lawsuit.
“History teaches us that houses of worship are vulnerable to armed attacks and congregants are particularly in need of the ability to defend themselves,” Deputy Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights R. Jonas Geissler wrote in a July 30 letter emailed to top county officials. “By disarming religious congregants during worship, Montgomery County infringes on such congregants’ ability to defend against such attacks.”
Churches and other places of worship have been attacked several times over the years, including in 2015, when a shooter killed nine people in a Charleston, South Carolina, church. A Mormon church was attacked in Grand Blanc, Michigan, in September 2025, while a San Diego mosque was targeted in May and the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh was struck by a mass shooter in October 2018. Armed security guards at a West Bloomfield, Michigan, synagogue thwarted a Lebanese migrant who drove a truck into the building in March, saving the lives of children and staff.
Democratic Montgomery County Executive Marc Elrich signed Bill 23-26 into law on July 27, updating the county’s ordinances in response to an April 28 ruling by the state Supreme Court that struck down some of the jurisdiction’s previous measures regarding carrying firearms.
Source: Daily Caller
